Dispatch: U.S. Military History Magazine

Welcome to Dispatch: U.S. Military History Magazine. This is “This Week in U.S. Military History,” where we walk through key moments that share this week on the calendar. Today we’re exploring events from May nineteenth through May twenty fifth.

For more military history sign up for the free magazine and visit Trackpads dot com for hundreds of articles, and hundreds of thousands of photos and videos. We also have several books on history whose sales support the free work we do.

Across these same dates in many different years, American volunteers have marched off to a new civil war, submariners have waited in the dark on the ocean floor, and airborne infantry have climbed rain soaked ridges in Vietnam. Some of the moments we will visit unfold at the sharp edge of battle, where regiments collide on narrow streets or wooded slopes. Others take place in rescue chambers and operations tents, where new technology and fresh doctrine are tested under intense pressure. This Week in U.S. Military History is part of Dispatch: U.S. Military History Magazine, developed by Trackpads dot com, and each story reminds us how local decisions can ripple into national strategy and public debate. As we move from the war torn towns of Virginia to the siege lines outside Vicksburg, on to the cold waters off New England and the heights of “Hamburger Hill,” we are really tracing the same themes of courage, adaptation, and sacrifice.

We begin in the first spring of the Civil War, when both sides still imagined that the fighting might be limited and short. Colonel Elmer Ellsworth, a close friend of President Abraham Lincoln, commanded the Eleventh New York “Fire Zouaves,” a regiment made up largely of New York City firefighters. On May twenty fourth, eighteen sixty one, he led his men across the Potomac River to occupy Alexandria, Virginia, where a large Confederate flag flew from the roof of the Marshall House inn. The flag was so prominent that it could be seen from the White House, and it deeply angered Lincoln, who saw it as a taunt. Ellsworth personally went to haul it down, but as he descended the stairs carrying the captured banner, the inn’s proprietor shot him at close range, killing him instantly. A sergeant in the regiment immediately killed the proprietor, yet the shock of Ellsworth’s death reverberated far beyond that staircase, as his body lay in state in the White House and newspapers described his idealism and friendship with the president.

Ellsworth’s killing signaled that this would not be a distant contest of abstractions but a war that reached deeply into personal relationships and family circles. One year later, the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia became the stage for a fast moving Confederate campaign designed to keep Union leaders off balance. On May twenty third, eighteen sixty two, Confederate forces under Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson attacked the small Union garrison at Front Royal, a town that guarded key road and rail links in the lower Valley. Union defenders, including a Maryland regiment, were surprised by the sudden appearance of their Confederate counterparts and quickly found themselves pressured from multiple directions. Outnumbered and outflanked, they fell back in disorder, abandoning supplies and opening the way toward the main Union force at Strasburg. News of the setback raced to Washington, where national leaders worried that Jackson might use the Valley roads to threaten the capital itself, proving that speed, local knowledge, and aggressive maneuver could let a smaller army unsettle strategy on a much larger scale.

The blow at Front Royal set the stage for a larger clash two days later that would rattle the Union high command even more. On May twenty fifth, eighteen sixty two, Union General Nathaniel Banks tried to hold the town of Winchester against Jackson’s advancing Confederates, whose columns converged on the Valley Pike from several directions. Through the morning, Union infantry and artillery contested ridges south of the town, but steady Confederate attacks pressed against their flanks and gradually unhinged the line. As positions crumbled, Banks’s men were pushed into a fighting retreat through the streets of Winchester, while civilians watched from doorways and windows as blue coated soldiers streamed north. The retreat turned into a long, exhausting withdrawal toward the Potomac River, and the scale of the setback deeply alarmed leaders in Washington. To guard the capital, President Lincoln held back significant forces that might otherwise have reinforced Union offensives near Richmond, showing how a hard driven regional offensive in the Valley could shape decisions in the main theater of war.

While those battles played out in Virginia, another great struggle unfolded a year later along the Mississippi River, which both sides understood as a central strategic prize. After a bold overland campaign that produced Union victories at places such as Port Gibson, Raymond, Jackson, Champion Hill, and the Big Black River, General Ulysses S. Grant brought his army up against the defenses of Vicksburg, Mississippi. On May nineteenth, eighteen sixty three, he ordered an immediate assault, hoping to exploit Confederate disarray and seize the fortress city by storm before the defenders could fully recover. Union troops advanced against strongpoints like the Stockade Redan, climbing tangled ravines and steep slopes under rifle fire, artillery bursts, and canister that turned the approaches into killing grounds. In many sectors, attacking units were pinned down short of the Confederate works, and efforts to bridge ditches or place scaling ladders broke apart under concentrated fire. By the end of the day, casualty lists made it clear that Vicksburg would not fall easily, and that its earthworks and commanding terrain would pose a formidable challenge to any future assault.

Undeterred by the failure of that first effort, Grant prepared a larger and more coordinated assault three days later. On May twenty second, eighteen sixty three, Union artillery pounded the Confederate lines through the morning, and attacking columns stepped off with specially selected volunteers, sometimes known as the “forlorn hope,” carrying ladders and planks to cross obstacles. Across the front, Union regiments again pushed up steep slopes and into dense obstructions such as abatis and well sited rifle pits, enduring a storm of small arms fire and exploding shells. In some places, small parties reached the outer faces of the Confederate works and clung there through the long day, unable to break through but unwilling to withdraw under such heavy fire. As evening came on, however, it was evident that even this larger, carefully prepared assault had failed to crack the defenses, at the cost of thousands of casualties. The repeated repulse convinced Grant that Vicksburg would have to be taken by siege rather than by frontal attack, and many of the volunteers who had gone forward in the forlorn hope would later be recognized for their persistence in an almost impossible task.

A year later in Virginia, Grant and Robert E. Lee were locked in another grinding contest that demanded constant movement and rapid adjustment from both armies. After the savage fighting in the Wilderness and at Spotsylvania, Grant again tried to sidestep Lee by moving southeast toward the North Anna River and the rail lines that fed Richmond. On May twenty third, eighteen sixty four, Union forces maneuvered to cross the river at several points, only to discover Confederate troops already entrenched on high ground. Lee arranged his lines in a distinctive inverted “V” formation that aimed to split the advancing Union army and create a chance to strike one wing while the other was held at bay. Skirmishes and sharp attacks flared around the river crossings, and the intricate positions on both sides exposed soldiers to confusing and often bloody engagements. Although neither army gained a decisive advantage at North Anna, the fighting there highlighted how quickly both sides had learned to entrench, to use rivers and ridges, and to endure the relentless casualties of a strategy that sought to wear down the enemy rather than win with a single, sweeping victory.

The technological side of American power brought its own dangers, even far from declared battlefields. On May twenty third, nineteen thirty nine, the submarine USS Squalus carried out a test dive off the coast of New Hampshire when a catastrophic failure in one of its main air and water systems flooded the aft compartments. The boat plunged to the bottom in cold, dark water with part of the crew trapped inside and little margin for error. Above the surface, rescue and salvage teams mobilized quickly, bringing out a newly developed diving bell designed to be lowered onto the submarine’s escape hatch. Over a series of tense operations, divers and rescuers worked in harsh conditions to mate the bell with the hull, transfer surviving sailors, and bring them back to the surface. Not everyone aboard lived, but the Squalus rescue became a landmark in undersea survival and recovery, shaping procedures, equipment, and training that would influence wartime submarine operations. It also proved that innovation in rescue technology could save lives just as surely as new weapons could take them.

More than a century after Ellsworth’s death in Alexandria, American troops were again fighting over a steep slope, this time in the A Shau Valley of Vietnam. From May tenth through May twentieth, nineteen sixty nine, airborne infantry and supporting units battled to seize Hill nine hundred thirty seven, a thickly forested height that soldiers came to call “Hamburger Hill” because of the grinding nature of the combat. On May twentieth, United States forces finally secured the crest after repeated assaults in rain, mud, and tangled jungle, having faced determined opposition from North Vietnamese defenders who used bunkers, camouflage, and the terrain itself to blunt attacks. The operation involved intense use of artillery and air strikes, along with close quarters fighting that tested small unit leadership and the endurance of individual soldiers. Militarily, the hill represented another effort to disrupt enemy units and deny them key ground in a difficult region. Politically and socially, the high casualties for a summit that was not permanently held fueled criticism of an attrition based strategy and raised painful questions about how success in Vietnam was being defined, giving the battle a legacy rooted as much in public debate as in the tactical outcome on that remote ridge.

Across these anniversaries in May, our journey runs from the narrow stairway of a Virginia inn to the bluff top trenches of Vicksburg, from a submerged hull off New England to a rain soaked mountain in Southeast Asia. Each episode turns on human choices under pressure, whether it is an officer deciding whether to storm fortified lines yet again, sailors placing their trust in unproven rescue gear, or infantry leaders guiding exhausted platoons up one more slope. The Civil War battles remind us how individual towns and valleys could shape national strategy, while later events show how technology and public opinion can become as central to warfare as rifles and artillery. For listeners of Dispatch: U.S. Military History Magazine, these stories offer a chance to trace enduring themes of initiative, adaptation, and sacrifice across very different eras. They also invite reflection on the service members who stand in similar uncertainty today, carrying forward traditions shaped on hillsides, river bluffs, and coastlines that once shared this same week on the calendar.